Skip to content

Conversation

@BLumia
Copy link
Member

@BLumia BLumia commented Sep 12, 2025

Log:

@BLumia BLumia requested a review from yixinshark September 12, 2025 02:26
deepin-ci-robot added a commit to linuxdeepin/dde-session-shell-snipe that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dde-session-shell.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dde-session-shell#42
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

我来审查这个 git diff 的变更内容。

这个 diff 显示了 .syncexclude 文件的变更,具体是删除了三行内容:

translations
*.ts
ts

语法逻辑分析

  • 被删除的内容都是有效的文件排除规则语法
  • 没有语法错误

代码质量分析

  • 删除的规则都很明确:
    1. translations - 排除名为 translations 的目录
    2. *.ts - 排除所有 .ts 文件
    3. ts - 排除名为 ts 的文件或目录
  • 这些规则的删除可能会影响同步或构建过程,因为之前这些文件是被排除在外的

代码性能分析

  • 这些变更本身不会直接影响性能
  • 但移除这些排除规则可能会导致同步或构建过程中处理更多文件,可能间接影响性能

代码安全分析

  • 没有直接的安全隐患
  • 但移除这些排除规则可能会暴露一些敏感文件或配置文件,需要确保这些文件本身不包含敏感信息

改进建议

  1. 审查必要性:在删除这些排除规则前,应该确认是否真的需要让这些文件参与同步或构建过程
  2. 替代方案:如果某些文件确实需要被排除,但不是全部,可以考虑更精确的排除规则,例如:
    translations/temp
    *.spec.ts
    ts/temp/
    
  3. 文档记录:建议记录下为什么删除这些排除规则,以便后续维护
  4. 渐进式变更:考虑先注释掉这些规则而不是直接删除,以便在确认没有问题后再删除:
    # translations
    # *.ts
    # ts
    

总的来说,这个变更看起来是为了让更多文件参与同步或构建过程,但需要确保这不会带来意外的副作用。建议在应用这个变更前,充分测试相关功能是否仍然按预期工作。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BLumia, yixinshark

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@BLumia BLumia merged commit 2d779c1 into linuxdeepin:master Sep 12, 2025
14 of 15 checks passed
@BLumia BLumia deleted the syncexclude branch September 12, 2025 02:26
yixinshark pushed a commit to linuxdeepin/dde-session-shell-snipe that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dde-session-shell.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dde-session-shell#42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants