Skip to content

Conversation

@nanotaboada
Copy link
Owner

@nanotaboada nanotaboada commented Apr 8, 2025

This change is Reviewable

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated image references in the project documentation for clearer visual guidance.
  • Chores

    • Refined configuration settings to streamline file management and quality monitoring.
    • Enhanced coverage reporting with updated targets, flags, and improved component categorization.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates several configuration and documentation files. In the .codacy.yml file, the exclusion list has been modified by removing certain paths (e.g., .github, .vscode) and adding new file patterns and directories, with some paths being re-added later. The README.md file has been changed by removing extra blank lines and updating image paths to reference files under assets/images/. Additionally, the codecov.yml file has been restructured—its ignore and coverage settings have been updated, and new sections (for flags, component management, and comments) have been introduced.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.codacy.yml Modified exclusion paths: removed .github, .vscode, LICENSE, and README.md; added new patterns for assets/**/*, postman_collections/**/*, **/*.yml, **/*.json, **/*.txt, **/__pycache__/, and **/*.pyc; re-added LICENSE and README.md.
README.md Removed two blank lines; updated image paths for the dependency diagram and API documentation from root references to assets/images/.
codecov.yml Restructured configuration: broadened ignore patterns; revised the coverage section to remove specific paths in favor of a default target (80%) and threshold (10%); simplified the patch section; added new sections for flags, component management, and comments.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (575aa81) 286 274 95.80%
Head commit (26f6f43) 286 (+0) 274 (+0) 95.80% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#328) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.60%. Comparing base (575aa81) to head (26f6f43).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #328      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.18%   95.60%   +6.41%     
==========================================
  Files           2        8       +6     
  Lines         111      273     +162     
==========================================
+ Hits           99      261     +162     
  Misses         12       12              
Components Coverage Δ
Services 79.31% <ø> (ø)
Routes 100.00% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
codecov.yml (1)

17-22: Review: Unit Test Flags Configuration

The new flags section for unit tests introduces paths for services/ and routes/ and enables carryforward. Verify that these directories accurately capture all intended unit tests and that the configuration functions as expected.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 575aa81 and a7f66ae.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • assets/images/python-samples-fastapi-restful-docs.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • assets/images/python-samples-fastapi-restful.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .codacy.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • codecov.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (11)
README.md (2)

24-24: Review: Dependency Diagram Image Path Update

The image path has been updated to use assets/images/, which reflects the new assets structure. Please verify that the file exists at the updated location.


46-46: Review: API Documentation Image Path Update

The API Documentation image path now points to assets/images/, which is consistent with the new directory structure. Ensure the referenced image file is present in the correct folder.

.codacy.yml (4)

4-4: Review: Exclusion Pattern for Assets Folder

The new exclusion of assets/**/* is appropriate for keeping asset files out of code quality analysis. Confirm that no critical asset files require linting.


7-7: Review: Exclusion for Postman Collections

The added pattern postman_collections/**/* helps exclude external API collections, which is in line with focusing on code files only.


10-14: Review: File Type Exclusion Patterns

The new exclusions for "**/*.yml", "**/*.json", "**/*.txt", "**/__pycache__/", and "**/*.pyc" effectively filter out ancillary files and compiled caches from analysis. Verify that these exclusions match your overall strategy.


15-17: Review: Re-adding LICENSE and README.md to Exclusions

Re-including LICENSE and README.md in the exclusion list may be intentional to reduce noise in the analysis. Please confirm that this decision is aligned with your quality and documentation review processes.

codecov.yml (5)

6-10: Review: Project Coverage Settings

The project coverage configuration now specifies a default target of 80% with a threshold of 10%, and handles missing coverage or CI failure appropriately. This provides a solid baseline—please ensure these values meet the project’s quality goals.


14-15: Review: Patch Coverage Settings

Aligning the patch coverage settings with a target of 80% and a threshold of 10% maintains consistency with the project-wide coverage goals.


24-31: Review: Component Management Configuration

The addition of the component_management section—with default rules and individual components for services and routes—improves overall coverage tracking. Note that branches excluding "main" are specified; please ensure this is in line with your team’s workflow.


42-44: Review: Comments Layout Configuration

The comment section now defines a clear layout ("header, diff, flags, components"), which should streamline the presentation of coverage reports.


45-59: Review: Updated Ignore Patterns

The ignore patterns, now mirroring those in .codacy.yml, comprehensively exclude non-critical files (assets, data, models, etc.) and align with the overall configuration strategy. Confirm that this list fully addresses your needs.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 8, 2025

@nanotaboada nanotaboada merged commit ab1ae28 into master Apr 8, 2025
25 checks passed
@nanotaboada nanotaboada deleted the feature/coverage-settings branch April 8, 2025 20:13
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants