-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
feature/coverage-settings #328
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates several configuration and documentation files. In the Changes
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #328 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.18% 95.60% +6.41%
==========================================
Files 2 8 +6
Lines 111 273 +162
==========================================
+ Hits 99 261 +162
Misses 12 12
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
codecov.yml (1)
17-22: Review: Unit Test Flags ConfigurationThe new
flagssection for unit tests introduces paths forservices/androutes/and enablescarryforward. Verify that these directories accurately capture all intended unit tests and that the configuration functions as expected.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
assets/images/python-samples-fastapi-restful-docs.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngassets/images/python-samples-fastapi-restful.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.codacy.yml(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)codecov.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (11)
README.md (2)
24-24: Review: Dependency Diagram Image Path UpdateThe image path has been updated to use
assets/images/, which reflects the new assets structure. Please verify that the file exists at the updated location.
46-46: Review: API Documentation Image Path UpdateThe API Documentation image path now points to
assets/images/, which is consistent with the new directory structure. Ensure the referenced image file is present in the correct folder..codacy.yml (4)
4-4: Review: Exclusion Pattern for Assets FolderThe new exclusion of
assets/**/*is appropriate for keeping asset files out of code quality analysis. Confirm that no critical asset files require linting.
7-7: Review: Exclusion for Postman CollectionsThe added pattern
postman_collections/**/*helps exclude external API collections, which is in line with focusing on code files only.
10-14: Review: File Type Exclusion PatternsThe new exclusions for
"**/*.yml","**/*.json","**/*.txt","**/__pycache__/", and"**/*.pyc"effectively filter out ancillary files and compiled caches from analysis. Verify that these exclusions match your overall strategy.
15-17: Review: Re-adding LICENSE and README.md to ExclusionsRe-including
LICENSEandREADME.mdin the exclusion list may be intentional to reduce noise in the analysis. Please confirm that this decision is aligned with your quality and documentation review processes.codecov.yml (5)
6-10: Review: Project Coverage SettingsThe project coverage configuration now specifies a default target of 80% with a threshold of 10%, and handles missing coverage or CI failure appropriately. This provides a solid baseline—please ensure these values meet the project’s quality goals.
14-15: Review: Patch Coverage SettingsAligning the patch coverage settings with a target of 80% and a threshold of 10% maintains consistency with the project-wide coverage goals.
24-31: Review: Component Management ConfigurationThe addition of the
component_managementsection—with default rules and individual components forservicesandroutes—improves overall coverage tracking. Note that branches excluding"main"are specified; please ensure this is in line with your team’s workflow.
42-44: Review: Comments Layout ConfigurationThe comment section now defines a clear layout (
"header, diff, flags, components"), which should streamline the presentation of coverage reports.
45-59: Review: Updated Ignore PatternsThe ignore patterns, now mirroring those in
.codacy.yml, comprehensively exclude non-critical files (assets, data, models, etc.) and align with the overall configuration strategy. Confirm that this list fully addresses your needs.
|



This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores