🌱 chore(lint): Upgrade golanglint from v2.7.2 to v2.8.0 and fix lint issues#1898
🌱 chore(lint): Upgrade golanglint from v2.7.2 to v2.8.0 and fix lint issues#1898camilamacedo86 wants to merge 1 commit intooperator-framework:masterfrom
Conversation
| # even when GOOS/GOARCH are set for cross-compilation of other targets. | ||
| GOHOSTOS ?= $(shell $(GO) env GOHOSTOS) | ||
| GOHOSTARCH ?= $(shell $(GO) env GOHOSTARCH) | ||
| GOHOSTARM ?= $(shell $(GO) env GOHOSTARM) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tmshort bingo get github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/v2/cmd/golangci-lint here is adding those,
I remember that we cannot add those ?
I think you did something to avoid it. Could you please help me out?
Can you please point out me how to fix it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So it seems all is fine.
I think we cannot add those for operator-controller only doing the upstream/downstream dance.
Here shows all fine.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1898 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 57.48% 57.47% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 138 138
Lines 13307 13307
==========================================
- Hits 7649 7648 -1
- Misses 4476 4477 +1
Partials 1182 1182 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
I have some reservations because this is an update to a new version of bingo as well as a new version of golangci-lint. Also, when we have lint issues here, we typically:
I'll need another pass for 3 above. Until then, please |
|
Hi @grokspawn Thank you for looking this one. Regards: #1898 (comment) We solved all suggestions. |
Can we start by splitting this PR into two?
I have some concerns that the bingo updates might have impacts during vendor repackaging, so I'd prefer to see it handled disjointly. What I was saying before is that the SQLite-related code is EOL and we generally do not touch it. I haven't made another pass to see if any proposed changes here are in that area, but I'll be happy to review the new PRs! |
No description provided.