Maintenance: Remove outdated krb5.m4 comment #2328
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yadij
added
M-cleared-for-merge
This was referenced Dec 23, 2025
rousskov
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2025
rousskov
changed the title
rousskov
changed the title
rousskov
reviewed
Dec 23, 2025
Contributor
rousskov
left a comment
rousskov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I adjusted PR title to emphasize the lack of runtime effects and to be more specific.
kinkie
approved these changes
Dec 25, 2025
squid-anubis
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 25, 2025
While some order dependency still exists, it is no more than should be expected with any set of autoconf checks.
squid-anubis
added
the
M-waiting-staging-checks
squid-anubis
added
M-merged
yadij
removed
the
S-could-use-an-approval
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While some order dependency still exists, it is no more
than should be expected with any set of autoconf checks.